Pseudo-dybe titler hjælper på den opfattede værdi af kunst

Steven Snedkers billede
Af Steven Snedker den 4. februar 2020 - 18:15 [0]

Tips når man skal give kunstværket navn

Det passer fint med at ArtSpeak er vrøvl, der fint kan maskingenereres. Måske med AI (!).

Meget loyale links
Kyle McDonald on Twitter
?psychology study confirms that "bullshit makes the art grow profounder": pseudo-profound titles have a positive effect on perception of artwork, computer-generated or not. via @juliaxgulia https://t.co/wvmrZEc3vn?
Artspeak sucks, and that's putting it in plain language
A piercing satire of the ?artspeak? that plagues the contemporary art world came this week from an unlikely source ? Old Navy, the clothing company.It?s an Old Navy ad starring the comedian Amy Poe?
Instant artist statement
If you're an artist and have been slaving away for hours at your artist statement - and it's still going nowhere - then this website is for you. One-click artist statements, for free.
This New Algorithm Writes Perfect ?Artspeak?
A machine-learning algorithm created by Istanbul-based artist Selçuk Artut generates wall text-ready art jargon at the press of a button.
Matt DesLauriers on Twitter
?I ran 10,000 artwork titles from the MoMA collection through an artificial intelligence to see what sort of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit Titles it comes up with. Here's some of my favourites:?

Tilføj kommentar

Ja, dette er et dumt spørgsmål med et nemt svar, men det er der kun fordi spam-robotter er for dumme til at besvare den slags, mens mennesker ikke er.
👍

Log ind eller registrer dig for at lægge langtidsholdbare, konstruktive kommentarer.
Registrerede brugere får bedre editor og flere likes.