"The good news coming from the Supreme Court was that in the United States, genes could not be patented.

Steven 🌞 Snedkers billede
Af Steven 🌞 Snedker den 18. juli 2013 - 8:30 [0]

"The good news coming from the Supreme Court was that in the United States, genes could not be patented. In a sense, the court gave back to women something they thought they already owned. This had two enormous practical implications: one is it meant that there could now be competition to develop better, more accurate, less expensive tests for the gene."

Overmåde fornuftig artikel om et overset problem med patenter.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/how-intellectual-property-reinforces-inequality/ ⟲

Meget loyalt link
How Intellectual Property Reinforces Inequality
In its recent, unanimous decision that human genes cannot be patented, the Supreme Court gave a rare victory to the cause of economic fairness.

Tilføj kommentar

Ja, dette er et dumt spørgsmål med et nemt svar, men det er der kun fordi spam-robotter er for dumme til at besvare den slags, mens mennesker ikke er.
👍

Log ind eller registrer dig for at lægge langtidsholdbare, konstruktive kommentarer.
Registrerede brugere får bedre editor og flere likes.