Ultrapersonligt it- og kulturstof for noble fritænkere
Den mand får da aldrig en ordentlig pamperstilling, hvis han bliver ved med at beskytte skatteydernes penge.
Den mand får da aldrig en ordentlig pamperstilling, hvis han bliver ved med at beskytte skatteydernes penge.
#GoldmanSachs #Dong #lovligkriminalitet
http://epn.dk/brancher/energi/ECE6434366/messerschmidt-goldman-sachs-lan-er-400-mio-kr-for-dyrt/
Log ind eller registrer dig for at lægge langtidsholdbare, konstruktive kommentarer.
Registrerede brugere får bedre editor og flere likes.
Kommentarer
Næh, men det er da sådanne politikere vi har behov for udtaler sig. Han påpeger et interessant aspekt, at renten er for at undgå en anmærkning fra EU. DONG egner sig nok næppe til Børsen pt., da det ikke er i den bedste forfatning og vi investorer ikke ville betale alverden for sådan et selskab. Men det er da relevant, hvad DONG står over for og hvordan disse udfordringer kan løses - det er jo trods alt el-forbrugernes penge oprinddeligt.
Jeg kender personligt en ansat hos DONG og de er dæleme godt lønnede. Jeg synes options-ordningerne er for generøse - det er el-forbrugernes egne penge, som de skal have.
Det er utroligt at man ti skal ud til EL og DF for at finde almindelige, sund midtbanefornuft. Både hvad angår ophavret, patent og tåbelige finansielle tiltag. Og hvad angår investeringer kan jeg godt lide "A deeper problem than fraudulent reporting is managerial theft. Investors have accounting firms and the SEC to protect them but the top managers have their hands on the company checkbook and their friends on the Board of Directors. In the old days if a company did well the managers would send a letter to shareholders: "The economy was booming last year and Blatzco prospered; your dividend is being doubled." In the 1980s and 1990s a more typical response to a boom year was management saying "Blatzco did well because we're such geniuses; we are going to take home all of the improved profit in the form of bonuses and stock options." Jack Welch in Straight from the Gut proudly states that during his 20 years as General Electric CEO the "employees", by which he means himself and some other top managers, went from 0% to 31% ownership of GE. Rephrased, Jack and his golf partners stole 31% of GE from the investors who owned the company in 1980. What's more, thanks to accounting rules that enable unlimited stock option grants without any charge to earnings, none of this had to be reported in financial statements. My cousin used to be an animator at Walt Disney. In the old days of Hollywood a boom and bust cycle of profits was to be expected. It is tough to predict whether a movie will be a hit. But after Michael Eisner joined the company in 1984 successes were attributed to superior management rather than luck. Eisner helped himself to more than $1 billion of the shareholders' money over the years. Thus when Disney ran into a string of flops the company didn't have enough cash to hang on until the next boom. Disney shut down its Los Angeles animation group and will use contract labor in Eastern Europe for future animated features.
It is tough to see how historically high rates of return on common stocks can be maintained in a world where managers steal most of the fruits that stem from the investors' capital."
http://philip.greenspun.com/materialism/money ⟲
Tilføj kommentar